Showing posts with label foreclosure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label foreclosure. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

The "Rocket Docket" or Expedited Foreclosure in Florida

Governor Rick Scott recently signed into law a bill that will speed up foreclosure cases in Florida. Consumer rights groups says this is a blow to homeowners. Economist types say it is good for getting all of the delinquent homes out of the courts. This article does not take a position in either way, but merely explains how the new law affects homeowners.


Prior to the passing of the law, which, by the way, goes into effect immediately, a bank would file a foreclosure complaint and serve it on the homeowner. The homeowner would then have 20 days to respond. Usually, the homeowner would ask for an extension of time to respond to the complaint, maybe another 20 days. Foreclosure defense firms would then file a motion to dismiss the complaint for some technical reason. The motion to dismiss would likely get denied, but there would be additional time to answer the complaint. Once an answer was filed, the bank would usually file a motion for summary judgment. Due to the numerous foreclosure cases pending in the system, a motion for summary judgment would not be heard for at least 90 days, sometimes much longer. When the motion for summary judgment would be brought up for hearing, the motion is normally granted and the court would set a sale date. Although the sale dates should be set within 25 days of the hearing, the courts routinely granted 90 day sale dates. Ten days after the sale date is the usual date when the homeowners' rights to the home are extinguished.


(Foreclosure defense attorneys often try to find ways to extend these times. The average foreclosure in Florida takes 853 days from the initial default to the foreclosure sale.)


The new law seeks to expedite the process significantly. However, there remain certain requirements that protect the homeowner. In many cases, the foreclosures were delayed because the banks could not establish a chain of title showing that they actually held the promissory note and mortgage. The new law requires that the foreclosure complaint clearly state facts to show that the bank is the holder of the note and mortgage at the time the complaint is filed. This may result in a delay in bringing the action.


Under the new law, once the complaint if filed, the bank, or even a homeowner's association, may file a request for the Court to enter an order to show cause for the entry of a foreclosure judgment. This hearing can be set as early as 45 days after the complaint has been served on the homeowner. If the homeowner does not present a viable defense, the Court can set a sale date at the hearing. At the new law's fastest application, a homeowner can be out of the home within 70 days of the date they are served with a complaint.


This certainly is a lot faster than the Courts have been proceeding. In reality, it is unlikely that the Courts will be able to move the cases this quickly. But, a homeowner should no longer think that when served with a complaint it will take months, if not years, before the house is foreclosed.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Strategic Default? Is it Really the Best Alternative?

I am sure that you have seen in the news about people giving up their homes as a "stretegic default". You may also be aware that people who lose their principal residence in foreclosure will not be responsible for taxes for the normally taxable event of a "loss forgiveness". When contemplating a "strategic default" homeowners can presently afford the home in which they are living but decide not to pay. They take the money that would be used for a mortgage payment and choose to put the money somewhere else that would be protected by the laws of the state. In Florida, that could include retirement plans, trusts, life insurance policies, or even another home. They may be protecting the assets but they may not be protecting themselves from personal liability. Eventually, the home will be foreclosed (probably more than a year in Florida from time of default to foreclosure sale). I will use the example of a $250,000 mortgage on a home that is now worth $125,000. Once it is foreclosed, the mortgage company will potentially have a "deficiency" of $125,000. If the foreclosure was completed prior to December 31, 2012 (this may again be extended by the new Congress), the deficiency balance, or loss forgiveness will not be taxable. However, this does not mean that the bank (or, the subsequent owner of the note) will not be able to pursue the homeowner for the balance. In a stretegic default, the homeowner would have been able to live "rent free" for at least 12 months. Assuming a mortgage payment of $2,000, they would have been able to save $24,000.00. But, after the foreclosure, they would still have a potential debt of $125,000.00. It is important to be aware that the bank will have five years (in Florida) from the sale date to pursue the $125,000 plus interest and cost. It is the fear of many bankruptcy attorneys that clients will choose to walk away from their home, forget about the potential liability and five years later be faced with a lawsuit. There are better options. Homeowners can choose between a "short sale" or "Deed in lieu of foreclosure". With a short sale, the homeowner puts the home up for sale at the market rate. The property must be advertised as a short sale and state that it is subject to the bank's approval. Once a buyer is found, the contract is presented to the bank for approval. There are a lot of internal unknown reasons for a bank to consider a short sale. The bank will not approve a short sale if the property is not being sold for "market value". Why they would reject a short sale is a mystery. As part of the short sale, the bank may require the financial records of the homeowner. A deed in lieu of foreclosure merely means that the homeonwer is giving the property back to the bank without the bank having to go through the foreclosure process. A Deed in lieu of foreclosure is usually unavailable if there is a second mortgage on the property. If there is a second mortgage, the second mortgage holder will have to approve the transfer as well. (If the first mortgage and second mortgage are held by the same bank, it does not mean it will be approved.) A bank will not likely accept a deed in lieu unless the homeonwer has taken efforts for at least six months to market the property. Many times the bank will forgive the deficiency indebtedness in the situation of a short sale or deed in lieu. But, it may be subject to the bank's review of the homeowner's financial records. If you have any question, please contact me at brian@bkmbankruptcy.com.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

BANKS SLOWING FORECLOSURE PROCESS

You may have recently heard that the banks are temporarily halting their foreclosures. What does this mean and why are they doing it?

When banks like Countrywide went under, the mortgages and promissory notes were "mis-placed". The assets of Countrywide were sold to other banks. When they sold the assets, the mortgages were supposed to go with them. In the rush to get the assets transferred, especially the mortgages (after all, your payments had to go to someone) the banks got sloppy with the paperwork. What the banks got was your electronic information, but not the actual papers.

Then homeowners got in financial trouble and could not pay the debt. The banks stopped receiving payments so they had to foreclose. The problem is, to foreclose in Florida (and most other states), you actually must have the note and mortgage. In a rush to foreclose, the banks hurriedly stamped the notes or tried less honest approaches to foreclosing the property. Although attorneys challenged the ownership of the mortgages, it wasn't until the banks' law firms started getting into trouble that the banks decided to take a deep breathe and review the paperwork.

This leaves mortgages in a state of flux. The question is, who owns the note and mortgage? There are many attorneys out there making a living off homeowners during this process. Some might even be saying that you may never have to pay for your home. This falls under the "too good to be true" category. If you want to eventually give up your home, then stay in it, fight the good fight and stay as long as you can and leave at the end of the process.

I am afraid many homeowners will buy into the chance that they will own their house without having to pay for it. Then, one day, after not having paid the mortgage for two years, they will be shocked when their home is sold in a foreclosure sale.